Ag Policy Blog

Budget Deal Funds Olmsted Locks

Chris Clayton
By  Chris Clayton , DTN Ag Policy Editor
Connect with Chris:

A lot is being made this morning about the so-called "Kentucky kickback" involving the Olmsted Lock and Dam project on the Ohio River.

A provision in the Continuing Appropriations Act of 2014 that the House and the Senate passed late Wednesday provides a rare earmark of $2.8 billion to complete the Olmsted Locks and Dam project on the Ohio River. The Olmsted project has been an albatross for the inland waterways industry.

The Olmsted upgrade was authorized in 1988 --- Ronald Reagan's presidency --- and started construction in 1992 at a projected cost of $775 million. The Corps of Engineers' project has yet to be completed and costs have soared to more than $3.1 billion.

Groups such as the Waterways Council have supported increasing financing reforms for lock and dam projects that would keep projects such as Olmsted from draining the fund. Barge operators want more assurances that projects will avoid cost overruns. Effectively, they have wanted to get Olmsted "off the books" because it was bleeding the trust fund used to help build waterway projects.

P[L1] D[0x0] M[300x250] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

The vote Wednesday effectively funds the project going forward.

Of course, some are crying foul over the earmark, given that Congress has banned earmarks. In particular, the Olmsted funding is being viewed as a political favor for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., for the work he did to bring an end to the federal shutdown and debt-ceiling crisis over the past week. McConnell is particularly drawing fire from conservatives. The Senate Conservatives Fund, a group tied to Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, ripped into the earmark on Wednesday, calling it a "Kentucky kickback," a reference to former Sen. Ben Nelson's Medicaid deal for Nebraska in return for Nelson's vote for the Affordable Care Act.

"The McConnell-Reid deal not only funds Obamacare and suspends the debt limit, it also includes a provision in Section 123 that increases funding for the Olmsted Locks and Dam in Kentucky from $775 million to $2.9 billion.

"In exchange for funding Obamacare and raising the debt limit, Mitch McConnell secured a $2 billion Kentucky kickback.

"This is an insult to Kentucky families who don't want to pay for Obamacare and who don't want to shoulder any more debt."

For more on the issue, see the Louisville Courier-Journal blog http://blogs.courier-journal.com/…

Army Corps of Engineers website on the Olmsted Locks & Dam project: http://www.lrl.usace.army.mil/…

Follow me on Twitter @ChrisClaytonDTN

P[] D[728x170] M[320x75] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]
P[L2] D[728x90] M[320x50] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

Comments

To comment, please Log In or Join our Community .

Bonnie Dukowitz
10/17/2013 | 9:30 AM CDT
So who is the bigger thief, Harry or Mitch? If one would go back in government spending, I think there would be enough of these type of favors found to balance the projected budget. If this waterway improvement is needed, it should be approved on its own merits, not a backroom deal.