Market Matters Blog

Old-Crop Corn Tumbles 95 Cents

The old crop corn market tanked 95 cents in the three days following USDA's bearish quarterly stocks report on Thursday. That's nearly a 13% haircut. Analysts and traders are trying to figure out where the unexpected 370 million extra bushels came from, and they're looking forwards to how USDA will justify it in the April supply and demand report.

The miserable export pace and unprofitable ethanol crush margins are well documented woes and most of USDA's recent adjustments have come from the feed and residual column. Take, for example, the smaller than expected quarterly stocks figure last December. It prompted USDA to revise its feed and residual use projections upwards by 300 mb in February's WASDE. One of the few changes USDA made in its March WASDE was another upward revision to the feed and residual category, this time 100 mb.

P[L1] D[0x0] M[300x250] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

"The implied rate of feed and residual use of corn in the first half, and particularly in the second quarter, of the 2012-13 marketing year is quite low," University of Illinois ag economist Darrel Good stated in a recent blog (http://bit.ly/…). "The slow rate of feed and residual use does not seem consistent with livestock numbers, a sharp reduction in the production of distiller’s grains, and the implied negative feed and residual use of wheat during the same six month period."

Another livestock economist agreed and told me that livestock numbers don't back up assertions of drastically lower feed demand. The latest Hogs and Pigs report is a prime example, it shows modest industry expansion along with a slightly larger supply of market hogs than traders expected.

USDA could attribute the increase to higher corn production last year than it previously estimated, or, if it does trim the feed category, it will likely come from the residual side of the ledger.

"I could see the April WASDE corn feed use number being lowered, but it can only come out of residual and not actual feed use," he said. "If we tighten corn feed and residual use much, we can rename that category feed use only as residual will be zero."

Either demand was destroyed somewhere or USDA found more corn. There could be a correction in the June Quarterly Stocks report, as Good points out. For the first time in a long time, traders will watch April's report closely.

P[] D[728x170] M[320x75] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]
P[L2] D[728x90] M[320x50] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

Comments

To comment, please Log In or Join our Community .

unknown writer
4/5/2013 | 12:00 AM CDT
GOOOD NEWS BOYS!! Sweet talk the banker and git the feedlot pens ready for fall...Its gonna be are time coming on this fall!! Corn is weaking and moisture for the plains!! Lets feed some cattle!! (For a profit finally were do!)
Freeport IL
4/3/2013 | 11:36 AM CDT
HOLD ON!!! The price swings from USDA's reports might move back higher with upcoming reports. The big decline in old crop corn (2012-13) prices seems to be related to the "fear" of increasing ending stocks in the USDA's balance sheet. The March 1 corn stocks indicate there was some 400 million bushels more than expected. There are three general schools of thought why this occurred: one; USDA under estimated this past fall's production, two; feed and residual use declined and lastly USDA "messed up" again. Although the other two reasons could be totally correct, we focused on the implications of the expected feed and residual use. Feed and residual use from quarter to quarter and first half versus last half has historically been very variable. If 2012-13 follows the early harvest pattern of the past two years (2010-11 and 2011-12), the whole 400 million bushel could end up in ending stocks. A more "normal" distribution of feed and residual use in the last half of the year might not seeing any increase in ending stocks from the "extra" bushels found in the stocks report. Feed and residual use has been that variable. (Or put more bluntly, that is how large the error in USDAâ?™s estimate of on farm stocks is.) The April WASDE report could shed some light on USDA's thought of feed and residual use. If they reduce feed and residual use, it will be a confirmation to the market and prices could remain weak. A "pass" by USDA may not be believable to the market resulting in minimal response. The June stocks report may be the place of confirmation for those still in a position to be bullish. Tt could be a long journey for those in the mood to attempt a trip to higher ground. So hold on.