Market Matters Blog

How Did 1984 Turn Out?

Todd Hultman
By  Todd Hultman , DTN Lead Analyst
Connect with Todd:

Five percent of the U.S. corn crop was planted as of April 28, according to Monday's USDA Crop Progress report, the slowest start to planting since 1984. Earlier that same day, December corn closed up 35 1/2 cents after the weather forecast turned cooler and wetter for the central U.S., increasing concerns that corn will be planted late in 2013, or in some areas, may not be planted at all. It is generally assumed that corn yields fall when planted after May 15. What happened to the corn crop of 1984? Did it survive the slow start?

On May 9, 1984, USDA reported 5% of the corn crop had been "seeded in the 17 major producing states, compared with ... 13% average." The report went on to describe a scenario that could have been written today. "Cool wet weather dominated much of the nation throughout the month (of April). Average temperatures for the month were 4 to 8 degrees colder than normal from the central Rockies into the lower Ohio Valley and from the central Plains to the southern and central Appalachians."

P[L1] D[0x0] M[300x250] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

Unlike this year, however, that 1984 report went on to say, "Temperatures were warmer than normal through the northern tier of states and into Canada." In 2013, the northern states and Canada have suffered a long, cold spring and soil temperatures are still in the 30s.

Now jump ahead to June 11, 1984: USDA published this description of May fieldwork: "Widespread rainfall delayed fieldwork across the eastern half of the nation for most of May. Land preparation and planting fell further behind schedule ..." Did the corn ever get planted? Well, yes. The rest of that sentence read, "... planting fell further behind schedule until midmonth when a week of generally open weather allowed rapid progress."

As it turned out, the corn crop that was only 5% planted on May 9, 1984, was 90% planted on June 3, 1984, thanks to the resourcefulness of American farmers and that one week of "generally open weather." Corn production totaled 7.674 billion bushels that year, 638 million bushels more than total use. Corn prices for the December 1984 contract dropped from $2.99 a bushel on May 9 to $2.65 3/4 by the end of November.

Does this mean that all will go well in 2013 and we will grow that 14-billion-bushel crop after all? Not necessarily. There are plenty of differences between the corn markets of 1984 and 2013. There are also great differences in the ability to plant large tracts of corn and in corn survivability and production. It is also worthy to note that the average start date of corn planting has gotten earlier over the years from 1984 to 2013. Info from Darrel Good at the University of Illinois said the late corn-planting date in 2013 is about 10 days earlier than it was in 1984.

I explained my concerns about the rosy outlook for 2013 corn production in the April 11, 2013, article, "Is It Time For December Corn?" However, the lessons of 1984 should give us pause before we race out and buy corn at limit-up prices. The markets are understandably concerned about this year's slow start, but it is still early and those concerns could evaporate with one week of generally open weather. May should be an interesting month.

Todd Hultman can be reached at todd.hultman@telventdtn.com

P[] D[728x170] M[320x75] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]
P[L2] D[728x90] M[320x50] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

Comments

To comment, please Log In or Join our Community .

Freeport IL
5/8/2013 | 12:11 PM CDT
The Judge had more of a smirk than a smile when he said; "The preponderance of the evidence (more probable than not) finds you guilty of all changes." With that I lost my self represented challenge to a traffic ticket. By all accounts I should have won. Many phrases came to mind when the verdict was spoken: Fish out of water; One legged man in a kicking contest; He how has himself as an attorney has a fool for a client and It is a legal system not a Justice system. That last one has caused the most thought. It seems justice is lost when the courts, judges and lawyers try to find an efficient and self serving method to handle their work load. I had been a believer efficient market theory. The theory basically states; "Only those with superior knowledge can one out perform the market but the cost of that knowledge removes the chance of a profit." Changes in the market structure have challenged that belief. Analog trading on the electronic platform is the most disturbing. Traders have always said; 'They trade the news till the news proves to be false." Their closeness to the market allows them to change their position quicker than the drop of a hat. Analog computer programs now trade on the first letter of a news story guessing what the news is. Superior knowledge gets slapped around with a guess at the start of a rumor. The futures markets were established for the benefit of commercial markets. It provides them with a mechanism for price stability. The export part of this market place seems to be working within historic ranges when the gulf basis is used as a standard. The challenge for the rest of us is the decline in exports as a percentage of total use. I am mainly looking at the corn market here. It declined 22% from an average of 18% of total corn use 1993-2002 to 14% from 2003-2012. This year it is projected at 7%. Until or unless the commercial market becomes the "driver" of price discovery, the futures market will have less meaningful value for the market place as a whole. (I never thought I would be cheering for the commercials.) Maybe once this tight supply situation straightens up, CME will once again be a place that represents physical value. It will more than likely not be this year with no old crop corn or no old crop soybean supplies, late planted new crop corn, soybeans and spring wheat and very sick winter wheat crop. The futures market's goal of efficient transaction of the work load provides little price discovery until the price has already been discovered. The efficient market theory is dying, at least at the futures level. Little justice will be achieved till the preponderance of the evidence proves otherwise. (That is a self fulfilling prophecy if I have ever heard one.) Buyers and sellers beware. Freeport, IL
Todd Hultman
5/7/2013 | 1:51 PM CDT
Hello Roger, Thanks for the comment. Yes, of course there were many differences in the overall environment for corn between now and 1984 and the larger ending stocks relative to use that you are referring to is one of them. I think that the relevant lesson from 1984 is that a lot of corn can be planted with the help of one good week of weather. And with this week's drier and warmer forecast for the Corn Belt, it looks like it was good reminder to not overreact too early to the late start in planting.
Roger Cooper
5/7/2013 | 7:36 AM CDT
Go back and look at the end stocks for corn from 1982 thru 1887! Any differences?