An Urban's Rural View

What Part of "Eat More Fruits and Vegetables" Do People Not Get?

Urban C Lehner
By  Urban C Lehner , Editor Emeritus
Connect with Urban:

Obesity is a worldwide problem, not just an American one, the Economist reports. The U.S. is Number One, with two-thirds of its population overweight, but Mexico, Venezuela and South Africa are giving us a run for our money. The Brits are right behind, with 60% overweight. "Even in China," says the magazine that calls itself a newspaper, "one in four adults was too fat in 2008." (http://tiny.cc/…)

Editorializing on the causes of this global phenomenon, the Economist sees both sides of the argument. "Obesity is, at its heart, the result of many personal decisions. But the rise of obesity -- across many countries and disproportionately among the poor -- suggests that becoming fat cannot just be blamed on individual frailty," the magazine says. "Millions of people, of all cultures, did not become lazy gluttons at the same time, en masse. Broader forces are at work."

P[L1] D[0x0] M[300x250] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

And the solutions? The Economist supports taxing sugary sodas and efforts to educate citizens on healthful eating. Mostly, though, it thinks it's up to individuals to solve the problem. The headline on the Economist's "leader," or editorial, says it all: "Fat chance: The state can do some things to encourage people to eat less, but not a lot."

As if too reinforce the Economist's point, two USDA economists just released a study showing that Americans largely ignore the USDA's "Dietary Guidelines," Uncle Sam's most important effort to educate the public on healthful eating. Examining extensive data on grocery-store purchases, Richard Volpe and Abigail Okrent found less than 60% adherence to the guidelines.

And health consciousness isn't, on the whole, improving. True, there were some encouraging signs. Comparing expenditures in 2006 to those in 1998, the economists found consumers spent more on whole grains and cut their meat expenditures. But the proportion of their food budget that went to processed foods increased, and the share to fruits and vegetables fell.

"Given that U.S. consumers have consistently eaten too few fruits and vegetables, any decrease in expenditures for these foods weakens overall purchase healthfulness," the economists wrote. "Examining food purchases from this broad perspective suggests that food purchase quality has not improved discernibly over this time period."

Urban Lehner

urbanity@hotmail.com

P[] D[728x170] M[320x75] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]
P[L2] D[728x90] M[320x50] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

Comments

To comment, please Log In or Join our Community .

Bonnie Dukowitz
12/19/2012 | 6:06 AM CST
C'mon Ric, Went out this morning to pick my local grapes. Whoops, single digit temps and over a foot of snow on the ground. How far away is local, farm to local? Went to the grocery store and,I'm guessing, 95% of the food was processed. I guess if I am after local oats, I'll have to get them from the cow feed.
Ric Ohge
12/17/2012 | 9:56 AM CST
One of the few things that Tom Vilsack ever espoused that I truly liked was his "Farm-To-Local" concept. Even if you're a "Meat-And-Potatoes" kind of person, an occasional salad or side of beans is still not unwelcome. The next Farm Bill needs to show some commitment to this concept. As of now funding for programs like this, as well as language that links this with SNAP and School Lunch Programs are curiously lacking. Since the nation is evermore against continuing to fund the "Epic Fail" War On Drugs, why not put some of that money back into the Farm Bill for the above and the rest into RFID Chipped Cards and Readers to insure the tragedy in Connecticut does NOT repeat. Even Obama said we had bigger fish to fry than spending Fed Dollars on Prohibition...looks like he's right.
Curt Zingula
12/17/2012 | 7:57 AM CST
"The U.S. is Number One, with two-thirds of its population overweight" I'm not going to oppose eating more fruits and vegetables, but I do take exception to using the statistics of the number of overweight people. There are numerous examples of people who are classified "overweight" but you wouldn't know it to look at them. I use myself as an example. When I took a physical as a job requirement, I stood 5'10", weighed 165lb, lifted weights and jogged. I was told I was "overweight" by 5 lb. - I could not come close to "pinch and inch". Let's also remember that many societies encourage "plump" as a desireable look. Those societies have brought their standards with them to this country - home of the free.