Ag Policy Blog

Nebraska Sees What Wind Power Offers Iowa

Chris Clayton
By  Chris Clayton , DTN Ag Policy Editor
Connect with Chris:

Last week, the Heritage Foundation sent Republican Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman a letter criticizing the federal Production Tax Credit for wind power and effectively crediting Nebraska for having "chosen not to mandate the production of electricity from unaffordable, unreliable sources of electricity."

The Heritage Foundation noted that conservatives oppose wind subsidies and that the group had send the same letter to 20 other governors.

In much of the mode of conservative economics, the Heritage Foundation continues to argue American society benefits by avoiding government policies that promote renewable energy, or renewable fuel for that matter. As the Heritage Foundation stated, Nebraska, "has wisely chosen to follow the most affordable and reliable forms of energy to be purchased by consumers and industries." Thus, Nebraskans shouldn't support federal tax credits for wind power, the thinking goes.

Yet, on Tuesday, another Republican governor, Iowa's Terry Branstad, was holding a press conference announcing Facebook would invest $300 million for a new data center in central Iowa, a facility that eventually could grow into a $1.5 billion investment. A new wind project also is part of the announcement.

That goes along with Google's construction of a $400 million data center just south of Council Bluffs, Iowa, just across the river from Nebraska.

P[L1] D[0x0] M[300x250] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

On the front page of the Omaha World-Herald on Wednesday was an article asking how Iowa had beat out Nebraska for the Facebook investment. "Nebraskans looking for a reason why Facebook chose Iowa over the Cornhusker State for a $300 million data center might want to glance at the horizon.

"In Iowa, you're much more likely to see a row of wind turbines spinning away."

The World-Herald cites Iowa's renewable energy portfolio as one of the reasons the social-networking giant picked Iowa over Nebraska. Iowa draws 18% of its power from wind. Obviously, that will bump up with yet another wind project in the state. Facebook wants its facility to draw at least 25% of its power from renewable energy, such as wind, the World-Herald stated.

"That surely made some difference," Iowa's state economic-development director told the paper.

The Des Moines Register reported that high-tech companies looking to expand are getting demands from consumers and environmental groups to ensure they use more green energy. These high-tech centers, after all, demand a great deal of electrical power to operate.

“In Iowa, Facebook has chosen a location where it has great potential to power its newest data center with the wind energy that is booming there, but to do so it must show a willingness to work with Iowa’s major utility, MidAmerican Energy, to provide more clean energy to the grid,” Greenpeace Senior IT Analyst Gary Cook said in a statement, cited in the Des Moines Register.

Moreover, landowners who allow windmill farms to develop on their land gain through leases that draw far more than they collect in federal direct payments each year. Yet, Nebraska remains locked in a conflict in the state legislature and among its public-power districts over just how to expand wind power in the state. There's a great deal of push back on wind energy, despite the potential from that steady wind whispering over the Great Plains.

Omaha World-Herald article: http://www.omaha.com/…

Des Moines Register article: http://dld.bz/…

I can be found on Twitter @ChrisClaytonDTN

P[] D[728x170] M[320x75] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]
P[L2] D[728x90] M[320x50] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

Comments

To comment, please Log In or Join our Community .

Jay Mcginnis
5/1/2013 | 5:58 AM CDT
While you folks from the "cracker barrel states" argue about renewable energy I am enjoying my sold, wind, geothermal and electric car! I don't send money to terrorists, don't pollute with carbon and don't fund your precious oil corporations! After 11,500 miles on my Leaf all I had to do was fill the tires with air,,, LOL!!!!! It all works and solar has gotten to the magic $1/watt panel prices but you guys will keep doing what Rush and Hanity instruct you to do! Saw a cartoon that says it all, a tea bagger telling some greenie at a global warming conference, "what if its all a hoax (global warming) and you make it a better world for nothing!" We need to get off the juice, it just makes a better place!
Bonnie Dukowitz
4/30/2013 | 5:27 AM CDT
Do not understand what Don is attempting to state. However, even a conservative with one leg makes more forward progress than an occupier laying in the path of developing infrastructure. It does not matter what routes of proposed construction will take, objecting Enviroes will impede the headway.
GORDON KEYES
4/28/2013 | 10:51 AM CDT
There is no private investor who is going to invest in this for areal long time. Your precious government will have to do it. Maybe THE ONE can invest in it and add it to the rest of his green energy failures which have cost us billions. He can get it from his stash of money that he thinks is his to do with as he pleases. A CONSERVATIVE Don is someone who will not borrow 40 cents of every dollar they spend and run his kids and grand kids into crushing debt for some pie in the sky things he thinks he should have for his instant gratification . There are other words for that that liberals hate to hear.
Don Thompson
4/28/2013 | 9:05 AM CDT
Bonnie, A Conservative is a man with two good legs who is afraid to take one step forward.
Bonnie Dukowitz
4/27/2013 | 7:49 AM CDT
And where, Vince, will the rare earths come from to manufacture the storage for your illusion? Would you also draw the routes which will be acceptable to the enviros, please.
Vince Moye
4/27/2013 | 6:03 AM CDT
Cross country long distance transmission lines will be built, high capacity electric storage will be installed then you both will be wrong.
Vince McGrath
4/26/2013 | 8:16 AM CDT
Wind and solar power is more of a public relations gimmick. Their high cost is rolled into the electric bill that every customer pays, incrementally increasing the cost of electricity to everyone. And the tax breaks that make them popular to developers are paid for by all taxpayers. That's how the windmill developers can afford to pay farmers the rental for putting their machines in the fields. Now that the federal gov't is cutting back on these tax breaks, wind and solar development is stalling out, and the developers' lobbyists are in full cry in Washington.
GORDON KEYES
4/25/2013 | 1:19 PM CDT
Build one coal or natural gas electricity generator, it will give you a reliable source of energy cheaper and more reliable than solar or wind. You will have to have one to produce electricity when the wind is not blowing or the sun goes down as it will every day. Clouds also are not helpful. You also will not have to clutter up the landscape with acres and acres of these monstrosities only to produce electricity that is more expensive. I am sure that Google and Facebook moved to Iowa because of solar and wind energy. Give a break.