Production Blog

Put Crop Theories to Test

In an attempt to make soybean rows close faster, Bob Wieland tried a new planting pattern in 2015. Rather than split the row, he came back across the field at a 30-degree angle. (DTN photo by Pamela Smith)

LAURA, Ill. (DTN) -- Bob Wieland is growing a field of diamonds in the rough. This spring the west central Illinois farmer tried a new soybean planting pattern that may or may not win out over his 30-inch rows. The point is he's trying something new and is testing it before committing a lot of resources.

"Trying new things keeps you on your toes," says Wieland, who farms near Laura, Ill. "With margins being what they are, it makes sense to try to do more with less. Every new product or idea gets a check strip on this farm to test how it performs in this local environment."

BASF Innovation Specialist Rodney Phelps rubber stamped the plan and helped Wieland devise the row space testing protocols. "It's so much fun to work with growers that aren't afraid to try something new.

"We're a little unsure if the beans will get too crowded where the rows intersect," Phelps said, signaling the crossing points at the top and bottom of each diamond, "but we're going to find out."

Wieland's goal was to find a planting pattern that will close the rows sooner -- limiting the opportunity for weeds to flourish and possibly reducing post herbicide applications -- all while allowing the soybean plant the chance to capture more sunlight.

P[L1] D[0x0] M[300x250] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

He typically plants in 30-inch rows. To get the diamond-pattern, he split a 160,000 plants per acre (ppa) seeding rate in half and planted 80,000 ppa in a regular pass and then, planted the field again with another 80,000 ppa at a 30-degree angle to the original rows.

Testing row configurations and avoiding the need to purchase a new planter also appealed to him. "I've got $30,000 to $40,000 in Precision Planting gear hanging on my soybean planter and would like to get more value out of that investment," Wieland explained.

He also tried splitting the row -- making 15 inch rows. However, that required running over the recently planted row. Conditions were dry enough that he hasn't noticed any emergence problems. He also tried planting at right angles.

"Splitting the row seems like it might encourage compaction and planting at right angles created rougher planting conditions. So far, I'm liking the way this 30-degree angle configuration looks, but the yield monitor will tell the tale this fall," Wieland said. He replicated the split planting tests in a couple of fields.

Meanwhile, Phelps plans to monitor the fields carefully this season to see if those rows actually do close faster.

As an agronomist, he encourages growers to consider strip trials to evaluate inputs such as nitrogen and fungicides. It's also a way to test novel new products. "It sounds simple, but it really is critical to try that new management practice or product on a limited acreage to find responses -- both negative and positive," Phelps said.

Yield is critical, but it isn't the only factor. The practice has to pencil out economically and be practical. The reliability of the economic comparison goes up as the number of reps or trials increase.

For additional ideas on how to develop test plots go to:

How to Establish Effective Side-by-Side Comparisons at http://bit.ly/…

Tips for Test Plots at http://bit.ly/…

Pam Smith can be reached at pam.smith@dtn.com

(ES)

P[] D[728x170] M[320x75] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]
P[L2] D[728x90] M[320x50] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

Comments

To comment, please Log In or Join our Community .

Pamela Smith
6/12/2015 | 7:37 PM CDT
Jeff--thanks for the observations. I've had a couple of people email me and tell me the same. It's great that you did the side-by-sides and figured it out before investing in a new system.
Pamela Smith
6/12/2015 | 2:00 PM CDT
Bryan that makes it super tough to get a crop in for sure. Sending good thoughts â?¦please be safe when you do get into the field and start pushing to get it in.
Unknown
6/12/2015 | 12:40 PM CDT
Pam it is the dividers that mash down the beans on each end of the head. A draper helps feed the material into the machine more efficiently than an auger conveyed machine. What I never will understand is why you would spend the big bucks on a draper then cut beans on an angle but I see it done everywhere. A friend of mine told me it was so he had a purpose for the auto steer he purchased. We split 30 inch rows and did diamonds 20 years ago and they did not yield any different than 30 inch rows. For 20 years now manufacturers and university people have been telling us we need narrower rows on soybeans and I bet I have done 10 side by sides over the years. The yield advantage that you do get {on our farm} does not come close to paying for the extra equipment costs and seed. Jeff Stocks
bryan paden
6/7/2015 | 12:42 PM CDT
Guess some are lucky enough to make it to the same field twice. Rained in NE Kansas 33 out of last 38 days. would like to plant just once.
Pamela Smith
6/3/2015 | 5:51 PM CDT
Good point on added time/fuel, etc. I have to admit that I found the patterns so much fun to photograph. I was near there yesterday and took another look, they sure are growing fast. I'll post another photo soon. I wonder if a draper head would take care of that harvesting issue Raymond?
Bonnie Dukowitz
6/2/2015 | 7:13 AM CDT
Nothing wrong with trying, however, this concept doubles the planting time, planting fuel consumption and wear on the equipment.
Raymond Simpkins
6/1/2015 | 5:54 PM CDT
Pam,I planted beans that way 8-10 years ago only in no-till. I did it for a couple of years in 2 angling fields, so I planted straight first then followed the angle side. I planted the same final pop. As I did in 30 in. rows and did not see any yield advantage. Just made them harder to spray and also every time the grain head divider crossed the row it would flatten a patch of beans.