DECATUR, Ill. (DTN) -- I have a couple of farmer buddies that show up when friends gather. Somewhere between the potluck dinner, games of bags or horseshoes and apple pie, we always have a discussion about what's new in our respective fields.
This past weekend, it was too cold to play outside and we were at a finger-food birthday party. I had to stifle more than one giggle as these guys negotiated delicate teacups with their once-too-often-smashed thumbs. The good news is we had more time to verbally mull over farming than if we were distracted by competitive sports.
I don't typically include these farmers in articles, but they are often sources. They are my gut-check -- my lifelines when I need to sort the facts from the chaff. They also don't think they know anything -- which makes me trust them all the more.
This weekend the discussion started like this: "Rich, have you got what you're doing this spring all figured out?"
Farmer Rich: "Yup. Opposite of what I did last year."
Rich is a firm believer in crop rotation. He decided a long time ago he wasn't going to try to outguess the market. The acreage he devoted to soybeans last year will be in corn this year and vice-versa. He might even throw a little wheat in the mix when he feels a field needs it.
Whether he admits it or not, his justification for rotation is based on a combination of what's best from an agronomic standpoint. There were probably years when he could have made more money planting corn-on-corn. However, he's also watching his neighbors take some significant yield hits for that practice.
This informal information gathering runs both ways. Rich always wants to know what articles I've been writing. Since I'd just finished up preparing several stories on weed resistance, that topic was top of mind.
More Recommended for You
The disease is in the Midwest in plenty of time to do economic damage to cornfields, particularly...
The Senate Appropriations Committee on Thursday voted unanimously to advance a funding bill for...
Me: "Are you worried about weeds and resistance to herbicides?"
Farmer Rich: "Nope. Don't have it. Not a problem."
Me: "Not even waterhemp? Marestail? Central Illinois was overrun with both of those weeds last year."
Farmer Rich: "Nope. I use a two-pass system. Always did. Never quit."
Me: "Weren't you tempted when Roundup got cheap?"
Farmer Rich: "Nope. If something appears easy and cheap, it usually ends up costing you in the end."
Hmmm ... I traveled to several different countries and across the U.S. last year to look at weeds. The message was always the same: we used the same product in the same crop in the same field over and over. It was simple. It was cheap. It worked. And then there would be that long hesitation, followed by the admission that "worked" may be past tense.
This week weed scientists from Missouri and Iowa both informed DTN that they've found weed populations capable of resisting five different classes of herbicide chemistry -- at the same time. That doesn't leave a lot of options.
Rich and I also discussed corn rootworms. Yep, we saw a resurgence of rootworm variant in Illinois last year -- which means soybeans aren't always a safe bet. However, rotation is still the best way to keep those beetles confused.
Rich made sure I knew that he didn't think my fascination with his dedication to rotation was all that big of a deal.
Me: "Well ... don't you think a lot of farmers maybe thought they could overcome those benefits with other practices."
Farmer Rich: "Ahh ... I don't know. Dad just told me it was always the best way and I never found one better."
(To see more on the benefits of crop rotation, see http://bit.ly/…)
Pamela Smith can be reached at Pamela.email@example.com
© Copyright 2014 DTN/The Progressive Farmer. All rights reserved.