An Urban's Rural View

The Changing Face of America

Urban C Lehner
By  Urban C Lehner , Editor Emeritus
Connect with Urban:

To split the year between the Oregon coast and the District of Columbia after nearly a decade in Omaha, as I've been doing, is to get a slap-in-the-face reminder of America's ethnic diversity.

The last time my wife and I lived in Washington, in the 1970s, the town had an African-American majority. Today it's a bit less than 50% black but teeming with other ethnic groups.

Maybe it's because our D.C. condo is near George Washington University, but when I venture out on the streets I see scores of Chinese, Japanese, Koreans and Indians from India. Everywhere I turn in the capital I hear Spanish.

P[L1] D[0x0] M[300x250] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

Omaha had ethnic diversity as well, of course, but by and large it felt plain vanilla. Washington, by comparison, foreshadows the coming of the "non-majority America." By 2042, the Census Bureau has said, the United States will be a country unlike any other in history. Thirty years from now no race or ethnic group -- white, black, Hispanic or Asian -- will have a majority of the American population.

Our culture already reflects this coming in ways big and small. So do our politics. Immigration reform -- an issue of no little interest to agriculture -- is back on the table largely because some leading Republicans think Mitt Romney's stance on immigration reform cost him the election. He got only 27% of the Hispanic vote, versus the 44% George W. Bush, a proponent of immigration reform, received in 2004.

Awareness of this coming multi-ethnic, multi-colored society has arrived much faster in some parts of the country than in others. If you're in agriculture in Florida or California or Texas, you know all about it. If you're in agriculture in Montana or Iowa or South Carolina, it may have less effect on your daily life.

But if the trend is variable in its impact, it is very real and almost certainly unstoppable. Were the U.S. to deport all 11 million of its illegal aliens -- which it won't -- that might affect the date the non-majority America arrives. But arrive it will. It's baked in, demographically. The question, politically, is how fast it spreads from Washington, D.C., to Omaha.

For the moment it's concentrated in the big cities and on the coasts. Republicans hang on to their majority in the House of Representatives because in our gerrymandered system so many Congressmen represent safe, white-majority districts in the heartland. How long will that last? And will the Republicans ever figure out how to woo the Hispanics and the blacks and other ethnics to vote GOP?

If diversity is one of America's strengths, as I have long believed, the country is about to become stronger. But many of its consequences are unpredictable, including some of the implications for agriculture. Labor-intensive farm operations have a keen interest in immigration reform, but all American farmers will feel the reverberations of the coming changes in our culture and our politics.

Urban Lehner can be reached at urbanity@hotmail.com

(SK)

P[] D[728x170] M[320x75] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]
P[L2] D[728x90] M[320x50] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

Comments

To comment, please Log In or Join our Community .

Bonnie Dukowitz
3/4/2013 | 5:40 AM CST
Thank you for the clarification, Urban. Paragraph 8 in your Editorial specifies Republicans in the House, hanging on to the majority by gerrymandering with no reference to Democrats. I am very well aware of who draws District lines which is why I referenced Cal. and N. York. Last year in Minnesota for example, the Dem. Gov. vetoed the Rep. majority House Districting Bill which resulted in the court system drawing district lines similar to what the Dems. had proposed. This could well have contributed to Rep. Congressman Cravak loosing to Dem. Congressman Nolan as the line was moved more into Congresswoman Bachmans District. Both the State House and Senate Republican majorities also lost to the Dems. in Mn.
Urban Lehner
3/3/2013 | 10:26 AM CST
For the record, I did not accuse either party of gerrymandering to the exclusion of the other. I said because gerrymandering is so pervasive, 85% of the seats are safe seats. This includes Democratic seats that are safe, but the Democrats are not the ones with the Hispanic-vote problem, which was the context in which I was discussing this. By the way, it's not the Congress that draws the Congressional districts. It's the state legislature in each state.
Bonnie Dukowitz
3/3/2013 | 5:58 AM CST
There you go again Jay, How can one assume I excluded Republicans from the mandering issue? As Mr. Lehners' is an Editorial, not a report, I attempted to ridicule him for excluding Dems. and members of the courts from this behavior. If he would prefer his column to be referenced as the " Liberal Gazette of the Uninformed" the space belongs to him.
Bonnie Dukowitz
3/2/2013 | 6:46 PM CST
You are correct Jay, The Republicans are just a little less liberal than the Democrats.
Jay Mcginnis
3/2/2013 | 1:51 PM CST
Romney allowed to win Penna. through voter ID, "DONE" (Mike Turzai June 23, 2012) Right Bonnie, GOP totally respects the system without gerrymandering! I also doubt that Lincoln would recognize his party today, he'd have to scratch his head the party names got switched somehow!
Bonnie Dukowitz
3/1/2013 | 7:43 PM CST
Absurd of you to reference Republicans and gerrymandering. I do not think I am wrong by doubting Republicans have ever had the majority in the house in a redistricting year. I am not going to take the time to look it up. Such states as Alaska, N. Dakota, S. Dakota only have one Rep., so gerrymandering is not a factor. How many Republican Reps. are from California and New York so who draws the district lines? I did not think I would ever read such a biased, slanted article such as this one on this site, Urban. Was it not the first Republican President in power when slavery was abolished.
Jay Mcginnis
3/1/2013 | 8:57 AM CST
Didn't ethnic diversity begin here in 1492 when 3 lost European ships were rescued by the true blooded Americans? Seems that is when this problem started,,,,, anyone suggest deporting all illegals since 1492?