An Urban's Rural View

Who Cares If Congress Takes a Month Off?

Urban C Lehner
By  Urban C Lehner , Editor Emeritus
Connect with Urban:

In the days before air conditioning, anyone who could get out of sultry, sweaty Washington in August did. Congressmen were no exception. The August recess dates back to the early days of the republic.

In 1970, responding to requests from young solons whose families wanted a predictable vacation, Congress made it official in the Legislative Reorganization Act. Of all the many breaks our Congressmen take each year the August recess is the only one enshrined in law.

This year they left town for the month without finishing a farm bill. When they return Sept. 9 there will only be nine legislative days left before the current farm bill expires Sept. 30. During those nine days the House must pass its food-stamps bill, the two houses must hammer out their differences in conference and both houses must pass whatever the conferees come up with. With all the other important business on Congress's plate, it will be tight.

P[L1] D[0x0] M[300x250] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

Before you grumble about lazy legislators taking those who produce their food for granted, though, consider this: The House and Senate are so far apart on food stamps they might have come up empty handed even if they'd stayed in session.

Only 24 Democrats supported the House Agriculture Committee's proposed farm bill, which called for $20 billion in food-stamp cuts over 10 years. Between those cuts and some poison-pill floor amendments on food stamps, that first House farm bill didn't pass. In the Democratic-majority Senate, the farm bill would not have passed 66-27 as it did without 18 Republican votes; several Democratic senators said no to $4 billion in food-stamp cuts.

If that's the reaction to $4 billion, just think how hard it will be to land Democratic votes in either chamber if the Republican-controlled House follows through on threats of a $40 billion cut.

That, says the ranking House Democrat on ag issues, Collin Peterson, would be "a political messaging bill to nowhere in an effort to try and placate the extreme right wing of their party." Senate Agriculture Committee Chair Debbie Stabenow has concluded that the House's majority floor leader, Eric Cantor, doesn't want a farm bill.

Maybe. Or maybe Cantor just doesn't have the votes for any kind of food-stamp legislation that could come close to becoming law. Many of the House GOP freshmen and sophomores don't seem to notice that their plan to shrink the government can't succeed as long as Democrats control the Senate and the White House.

A grizzled veteran Washington reporter I knew back in the 1970s liked to say that every day the Congress isn't in session, the republic is safer. Unfortunately for farmers, the farm bill this year isn't safe whether Congress is in session or not.

urbanity@hotmail.com

P[] D[728x170] M[320x75] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]
P[L2] D[728x90] M[320x50] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

Comments

To comment, please Log In or Join our Community .

GORDON KEYES
8/9/2013 | 9:38 AM CDT
It is no longer the 1960 s you old moldy liberals have to get over it what you need to do is start doing t is something to help instead of throwing enough failing programs and money at people so they will hang around and vote for your failing policies. The school system and liberal policies failed this kid big time while trying to make themselves look good. There is something terribly wrong with that.
Bonnie Dukowitz
8/9/2013 | 9:21 AM CDT
Do not know much about how one should judge ancestry. Blond and blue eyes, might be Swedes. I understood Mediteranian Rim decendants were classified as minorities. What do so-called whites have to do with the liberal press and the government creating mutiny and agitating this Florida situation? I fail to see where these comments relate to a farm subject website. People are going to kill each other whether Congress takes off a month or a year. They might as well do like the Pres. and take a year or 5 off.
Jay Mcginnis
8/9/2013 | 6:22 AM CDT
Well Gordon, if Martin was a White girl (17 is still a minor for both Blacks and Whites) and Zimmerman was a Black male and the exact same scenario happened I am certain both you and the Rush/Hanity crowd would have a totally different position and that Zimmerman would be on death role. I am old enough to remember in the 1960's how my 8 yr old friend was treated when we tried to go to the public swimming pool and you know that stink is still around and the Martin/Zimmerman case has the exact same smell.
GORDON KEYES
8/8/2013 | 7:12 PM CDT
The king of pandering lines in the White House. He has told so many lies to so people he cant even remember who or what he has told to which group desperately trying to build his pathetic image. He has failed at almost everything. He cant help himself, all of his influences are from his father which was hard socialist, his mother who spent almost as little time with him as possible. His chose for his mentor Frank Marshall Davis an avowed communist. Most of all he has failed the blacks he is using to keep racism alive so he can always fall back on that and it makes a good excuse for all liberals who make a good argument for their failed policies. The latest example of his pandering and failure to the black community is the Martin-Zimmerman trial in Florida, the county and local law enforcement saw no reason to charge Zimmerman. Barak and Holder stuck their noses in to make a statement to appease a bunch of liberals. The liberal totally failed this kid because they were trying by fudging the make the black crime stats in the Miami-Dade school system look better. This poor kid should have been in juvenile detention getting an education of what a miserable life he was slipping into. Just leaving him to his own devices and shipping him off to another school is the real crime. Liberalism at its best.
Jay Mcginnis
8/6/2013 | 7:07 AM CDT
The Party of Tea is trying its best to bag the republic. I saw Ted Cruz speak at Princeton University this past spring and for a man so educated he knows what will work and what won't so why is he pandering to people that want to bring down the government? One has to wonder if he has actually talked himself into believing this ideology or if he is just "grandstanding" the majority of the inhabitants in the "cracker barrel" states? There won't be any thing from the senate, nothing as long as people like Cruz are determined to scream "fire" in the sessions.