Groups: End Livestock Antibiotic Shield

Environmental Groups Want FDA to Stop Farmers From Giving Low-Dose Antibiotics to Livestock

Todd Neeley
By  Todd Neeley , DTN Environmental Editor
Connect with Todd:
Environmental and public health groups want the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to stop allowing farmers to use antibiotics in livestock to prevent disease. (DTN file photo)

LINCOLN, Neb. (DTN) -- Environmental and health groups want the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to stop allowing livestock producers to administer subtherapeutic levels of antibiotics to herds to prevent disease. The groups argue in a new lawsuit that the practice, which is common in rural America, is causing growing antibiotic resistance in people.

In a lawsuit filed on Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, the National Resource Defense Council, Earthjustice, Food Animal Concerns Trust, Public Citizen and other public health and consumer groups asked the court to set aside a 2021 agency denial of a petition and require FDA to either grant or reconsider the petition.

In 2016, the groups asked FDA to ban the use of antibiotics in livestock and poultry in the absence of illness. In denying the petition in 2021, FDA said it agreed with the petitioners that the practice may be contributing to human antibiotic resistance.

The classes of antibiotics identified include macrolides, lincosamides, penicillins, streptogramins, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides and sulfonamides.

The groups provided FDA with additional research in 2020 that purported to show that antibiotic use remains high in beef, pork and turkey production.

The lawsuit said livestock producers have been adding low doses of antibiotics to animal feed since the 1950s. Today, about two-thirds of all antibiotics sold in the U.S. are for use in food-producing animals.

"A significant percentage of these antibiotics are administered flock- or herd-wide at subtherapeutic levels," the lawsuit said, "that is, below the dose used to treat disease -- and over extended periods of time, to prevent diseases that occur more frequently when animals are kept in cramped, dirty conditions common to intensive animal facilities."

The groups said in the lawsuit they do not want "short-term" antibiotic uses to end because such uses are to treat sick animals.

"Resistant bacteria from industrial animal facilities can spread to humans who are exposed to meat products or livestock," the lawsuit said.

"Data indicate that retail meat products are frequently contaminated by salmonella, campylobacter, E. coli and other bacteria that are resistant to multiple classes of antibiotics. Various epidemiological studies have confirmed that these bacteria have been transferred to people."

In 2017, a veterinary feed directive issued by the FDA moved antimicrobials away from over-the-counter sales to prescription or VFD status (…).

Production claims related to their uses as growth agents were removed from labels. FDA numbers released in 2020 showed decreased levels in sales and distribution numbers of "medically important antimicrobials approved for use in food-producing animals."

For example, FDA said tetracycline numbers decreased 40%. Overall sales and distribution attributed to cattle dropped 35%; the same decrease was recorded in swine. The chicken industry led with a 47% decrease.

The VFD and pressure to reduce antimicrobial use to comply with consumer marketing programs opened the door to several products touted as options or even replacements for antimicrobials.

The new lawsuit is critical of the VFD, saying the agency "disclaimed any numerical targets for reducing antibiotic use and explained that it was focused instead 'on supporting judicious use'" of antibiotics.

"Judicious use under FDA's voluntary guidance documents does not include analysis of human health effects of feeding antibiotics to entire herds or flocks over long periods of time," the lawsuit said.

"The agency's decision did not respond to the petition's core argument that eliminating the preventive use of medically important antibiotics in food-producing animals is necessary to safeguard public health."

The groups said more than 2.8 million antibiotic-resistant infections occur in the U.S. annually.

"These difficult-to-treat infections contribute to as many as 162,000 deaths annually," the lawsuit said.

"The antibiotic-resistance crisis is fueled in significant part by the misuse and overuse of antibiotics in industrial livestock and poultry production.

"If FDA were to grant the petition and withdraw approval for subtherapeutic uses of medically important antibiotics in animal feed, the prevalence of bacteria in livestock with resistance to those drugs would stop increasing and would likely decrease."

Read more on DTN:

"Antimicrobial Alternatives High Priority for Beef Industry,"….

Todd Neeley can be reached at

Follow him on Twitter @DTNeeley

Todd Neeley

Todd Neeley
Connect with Todd: