Swine Firms Blame Banker in Check-Kiting

Swine Companies at Center of Alleged Check-Kiting Scheme Blame Their Bank

Todd Neeley
By  Todd Neeley , DTN Environmental Editor
Connect with Todd:
The owners of an Alberta, Canada-based swine company filed a counterclaim in U.S. federal court at the end of last week. (DTN file photo by Jennifer Carrico)

LINCOLN, Neb. (DTN) -- A Canadian swine company accused of conducting a billion-dollar check-kiting scheme at three swine operations in South Dakota and Iowa alleged in a counter claim against its banker, Compeer Financial, that the financier is to blame for the handling of the company's accounts.

On April 11, in an answer to a complaint filed by Compeer against Sunwold Farms Inc., Sunterra Farms Iowa Inc., and Lariagra Farms South Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota, the companies alleged that Compeer committed breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation and tortious interference.

Alberta-based Sunterra Group filed for federal bankruptcy protection in Canada last month in an attempt to restructure its business, as the family that owns and operates the company also has had three swine facilities in the U.S. placed into receivership.

Court records show the operator of Sunwold Farms Inc. in Beresford, South Dakota; Lariagra Farms South Inc. in Parkston, South Dakota; and Sunterra Farms Iowa Inc. in Rock Valley is no longer able to cover operating expenses and owes more than $36 million to Compeer Financial based in Minnesota. Sunterra Group is owned and operated by brothers Ray, Art and Glen Price, and Ray serves as CEO.

Part of the allegations raised in the counterclaim are that Compeer essentially pushed the companies into receivership without giving them a chance to restructure financing.

"Contrary to Compeer's representations in its verified complaint, the activity that Compeer claims was so alarming that it had to freeze its borrowers' funds was something that Compeer knew about and even helped facilitate," the defendants in the case allege in a counterclaim.

"Counterclaim plaintiffs, in reliance on Compeer's representations, continued business as usual, entered into agreements with third parties and continued supplying substantial business to other farmers and suppliers ... in southeast South Dakota and beyond."

P[L1] D[0x0] M[300x250] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

The companies allege Compeer is the "cause of the current misfortune" and has "tried to turn the causation of those effects around on counterclaim plaintiffs."

The swine companies asked the court to dismiss Compeer's lawsuit.

"Compeer knew, for years, about any alleged cash flow issues with counterclaim plaintiffs and repeatedly told counterclaim plaintiffs that it would work with them, understood their cashflow and projections and would be there for counterclaim plaintiffs to find future solutions," the companies told the court.

"The transfers that Compeer now characterizes as alleged 'check kiting' have gone on for years with Compeer's knowledge and assistance. In fact, Compeer assisted counterclaim plaintiffs move money between accounts and increased counterclaim plaintiffs' credit line advances to help facilitate those transfers."

The swine companies said Compeer is not "some disinterested lender" that just discovered some "untoward" conduct.

"Compeer not just knew but aided and abetted counterclaim plaintiffs with that conduct," the companies said. "The only difference is that Compeer recently decided to recharacterize that conduct from standard business practices to something it was not."

The swine companies said as early as 2020, Compeer had discussions with them about their "revenue cycle and account management" that included the "nature of the cashflow and payments made between accounts."

The companies said in their counterclaims that Compeer "understood that overcommitments may happen" during the course of operation of swine businesses.

In July of 2023, the swine companies said they began discussing with Compeer the possibility of merging Sunwold, Sunterra and Lariagra into a "combined unit" in the U.S.

"During the years that Compeer had both firsthand knowledge and discussions with counterclaim plaintiffs about conduct that Compeer now asserts as conduct constituting 'check kiting,'" the companies said in the court filing.

"Compeer reported to other financial institutions that counterclaim plaintiffs were not in default and told counterclaim plaintiffs that counterclaim plaintiffs' conduct was consistent with applicable industry standards."

Read more on DTN:

"Swine Company Forced Into Receivership," https://www.dtnpf.com/…

Todd Neeley can be reached at todd.neeley@dtn.com.

Follow him on social platform X @DTNeeley

P[] D[728x170] M[320x75] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]
P[L2] D[728x90] M[320x50] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]
P[R1] D[300x250] M[300x250] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]
P[R2] D[300x250] M[320x50] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]
DIM[1x3] LBL[article-box] SEL[] IDX[] TMPL[standalone] T[]
P[R3] D[300x250] M[0x0] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

Todd Neeley

Todd Neeley
Connect with Todd: