Bankruptcy Concerns?

Ag lender CoBank anticipates more Chapter 12 filings in 2018.

Todd Neeley
By  Todd Neeley , DTN Staff Reporter
Connect with Todd:
A new report by CoBank predicts more farmers will turn to Chapter 12 bankruptcy this year, Image by photo illustration: Barry Falkner / Brent Warren

More farmers likely will be filing Chapter 12 bankruptcy in 2018 as they continue to struggle with costs of production exceeding commodity prices. That’s according to a new report from ag lender CoBank.

“CoBank 2018 Year Ahead Report: Forces That Will Shape the Rural Economy” says commodity price depression from surpluses around the world will make for another belt-tightening year for farmers who will continue to see working capital diminish.

As a result, CoBank says, more producers are likely to turn to Chapter 12.

Chapter 12 is designed specifically for farmers with regular annual income and allows them to stop debt collection and establish repayment plans of three to five years with creditors. The law also allows farmers to restructure debt without forming creditors’ committees.

“Farmer solvency is an increasing concern in some regions,” the report says.

“Wheat and dairy producers are among the hardest hit in this down cycle, as evidenced by an increase in Chapter 12 bankruptcy filings in Kansas and Wisconsin. Chapter 12 bankruptcies, which last year reached the highest level since 2012, are expected to accelerate in 2018 in the absence of a major upward correction in farm gate prices.”

The number of Chapter 12 filings has been on the rise since 2014, according to CoBank. There were about 380 filings in 2014. That number spiked to just more than 500 in 2017, according to the report.

Joseph A. Peiffer, an agriculture bankruptcy attorney based in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, expects to see more farmers filing for Chapter 12.

“I agree that there will be numerous Chapter 12 filed this year,” he says. “Chapter 12 can be an effective tool for farmers to use. Unfortunately, now, if the proceeds from crops are not sufficient to pay the cost of production in full, the farmer loses money. If the farmer loses money, the farmer does not have sufficient money to service debt.”

Peiffer points out the current farm crisis is different than in the 1980s. Back then, the price of land and rent dropped, so farmers could cover production costs, feed their families and maintain a cash-flow.

“Today, the price of land has not dropped nearly far enough that the farmer can pay for it,” he says. “Remember, the costs of production are not being covered.”

Peiffer says Chapter 12 is helpful for farmers needing to sell land, machinery and breeding stock and incurring taxes. Provisions signed into law on Oct. 26, 2017, allow farmers to deprioritize taxes.

Due to these provisions, tax creditors will receive the same amount that unsecured creditors receive on the deprioritized taxes.

One of the issues producers still face when it comes to Chapter 12, Peiffer says, is the cap for total debt on the farm is $4,153,150. This means many farmers are ineligible for Chapter 12 because their debts often are higher than the cap.

“Many exceed it either because their individual borrowing is too high, or they have cosigned debt to help a son or daughter start farming,” he says.

“The debt limit is too low in Iowa. However, in many other states, it covers most farmers. Some of my clients sell assets so they qualify for Chapter 12,” Peiffer says.

AG ASSETS FIRM. The CoBank report points out agriculture’s balance sheet is “well positioned for a multiyear adjustment process.” Farm asset values that include primarily farm land have “remained firm despite persistently weak underlying crop prices.

“Many producers still have strong equity positions that enable them to bid aggressively for the limited land that becomes available at relatively low interest rates,” the report says.

“The historically low interest rates have also kept institutional investors in the game,” it continues. “Until enough producers lose the financial capacity to expand, or investors shy away from low capitalization rates, land prices will remain stubbornly elevated relative to farm income.”

CoBank points out if commodity prices deteriorate further, and the Federal Reserve tightens its monetary policy, those actions would “add a new level of risk to land values and farmer solvency in 2018.

“The continuous rise [of interest rates] hints that more financial stress looms in the year ahead,” the report says.

Though farm income improved in 2017 as a result of a good year for the livestock sector, CoBank concludes “farm financial stress will remain a common theme across the countryside.”

The report says debt loads continue to climb for farmers as they struggle to cover production costs with lower commodity prices.

“Ag retailers and cooperatives are also feeling the strain, keeping the topic of mergers and acquisitions on the table in co-op board rooms,” CoBank says.

“Still, there is room for optimism. While inventories for most commodities are abundant, and global competition remains intense, the level of grain and oilseed inventories would be substantively impacted by one poor U.S. harvest. Animal protein and dairy prices could also improve modestly if the forecasted production increases come up short, or global demand growth outperforms. Producers will be aggressively seeking cost-control options to maintain profitability and will be putting increased pressure on their input suppliers.”

CoBank says larger product movement will benefit farmer cooperatives as producers look to improve cash-flow.

As a result of these conditions, the report explains, cooperatives “will be under increasing pressure to provide inputs, productivity enhancements, speed and space, and risk-management options at lower costs while assuming greater inventory risk.”

PRESENT CONDTIONS VARY. Though many comparisons to the 1980s farm crisis often are made, CoBank says the current state of affairs is different in a few key areas.

“The industry’s balance sheet is still much stronger than during the prior correction,” the report explains. “During that period, producers were more highly leveraged, interest rates were in the double digits, and commodity prices suffered a faster and deeper correction as foreign demand for U.S. grains cratered.

“In comparison, producers and lenders in recent years have been more disciplined,” it explains. “The debt-to-asset ratio is currently just over 12% compared to the 20% level that prevailed in the 1980s.”

However, CoBank adds farm debt relative to income is “creeping closer to the concerning levels of the 1980s.

“This cautious optimism must be tempered by the harsh reality that market conditions could change rapidly, and many structural adjustments will be under way in 2018,” the report says.

“The sector will experience increasing pressure in terms of cash-flow and asset valuations. Market conditions have resulted in a sharp, unsustainable divergence between farm income and farm asset values,” it says. “The timing and extent of the market’s correction will be determined by much more than commodity prices and cash-flow, however. The prevailing economic environment, interest rate levels, investor appetite, trade, changes to the tax code, the 2018 farm bill and the changing regulatory environment will all play a role.”

For More Information:

CoBank’s 2018 Year Ahead Report


Past Issues