Washington Insider -- Monday

A Major Trade Clash Moves Closer

Here’s a quick monitor of Washington farm and trade policy issues from DTN’s well-placed observer.

EPA's Wheeler says agency can do E15 without Congress

EPA has the authority to move ahead and approve year-round sales of E15 without the help of Congress, according to acting Administrator Andrew Wheeler. "We do have the authority to move forward on E15," Wheeler told reporters after a Washington event Thursday.

He further called on the U.S. oil industry to join, not fight the effort. "I hope the oil industry would join us in helping make (U.S. biofuel policy) function better for the American public, rather than taking it to court," Wheeler stated.

EPA has signaled their proposal on E15 and reforms of the Renewable Identification Number (RIN) market would be released by February.


USDA's Perdue expects aid package from Congress

Lawmakers are being urged to approve another hefty package of disaster aid for farmers in the Southeast in the aftermath of the recent hurricanes.

“Current safety net programs we have for farms in the farm bill are not going to be adequate for this kind of devastation,” USDA Secretary Sonny Perdue told reporters Thursday. “We just want to make them where they can continue to farm and feed their families.”

Perdue said USDA will need a supplemental appropriation similar to the $2.4 billion in agricultural disaster aid that Congress funded following the 2017 hurricanes.


Washington Insider: Major Trade Clash Looms Closer

Bloomberg is reporting this week that the U.S., China and the European Union moved a few steps closer to a major clash at the World Trade Organization that risks testing the global trade referee’s neutrality – and President Donald Trump’s patience for an institution he already hates.

In a volley of filings, the European Union (EU), China and the U.S. last week escalated disputes over new U.S. metals tariffs, the European response to those levies, and Chinese intellectual property practices.

The moves show how major powers like the EU and China are standing up to Trump’s “America First” trade maneuvers and challenging his willingness to go outside global trade rules. They set the stage for a major showdown over sensitive and largely untested areas of global trade rules, such as when a country is allowed to invoke national security in imposing tariffs.

“These are the most contentious disputes the WTO has heard,” said Chad Bown, an expert on WTO disputes at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington. “2019 is going to be an important year for the WTO.”

Trump has threatened to withdraw from the WTO and has repeatedly characterized the Geneva-based organization as being biased against U.S. interests. The U.S., he told Bloomberg, has been treated “very badly.”

President Trump, Bloomberg says, also is slowly “strangling” the WTO’s dispute settlement system by blocking the appointment of new judges to its appellate body. That’s left the de facto Supreme Court of global trade, which mediates disputes affecting some of the world’s largest companies, with just three of its usual seven judges in place.

Given Trump’s animosity, the hobbled dispute settlement mechanism faces a lose-lose situation when it rules on whether and how a country can defend its trade behaviors in order to preserve its national security. Under WTO rules, countries can act to restrict trade in times of war. But the exception has rarely been invoked for fear that doing so would open a Pandora’s box of protectionist measures and tit-for-tat tariffs.

Thus, by invoking national security and declaring that a country’s economic health is a building block for national defense, the Trump administration has been “stretching the rules,” most trade experts agree. But the U.S. has argued that for the WTO to even rule on whether a country can invoke national security would violate its members’ sovereignty, Bloomberg says.

If the WTO goes along with the U.S. national security argument, though, it could encourage Trump to implement new tariffs on cars, and spur a proliferation of other new trade restrictions authorized under the guise of national security.

The U.S. Commerce Department is in the process of investigating whether foreign imports of autos and auto parts are having a detrimental impact on national security. The inquiry is identical to the process the U.S. pursued earlier this year, after which it implemented 25% tariffs on steel and 10% tariffs on aluminum.

WTO Director-General Roberto Azevedo, fearful of what such a national security ruling could lead to, has urged members to avoid taking that fight to the trade body. “National security is something that is not technical,” Azevedo said in 2017. “It is not something that will be solved by a dispute in the WTO. That requires conversation at the highest political level.”

Yet by pressing on with their disputes at the WTO, the EU, China and other countries challenging the U.S. are ignoring that advice, Bloomberg says.

It’s possible that the disputes never reach the appellate stage if the Trump administration maintains its block on new appellate body nominees for another year or more. The three judges remaining are the bare minimum required to adjudicate appellate cases. The terms of two of the three expire in December 2019, which would leave the body paralyzed.

Meanwhile, there are already other cases in the system that could draw U.S. objections.

An initial ruling is expected in December in a fight over Moscow’s moves to restrict the movement of Ukrainian freight, in what’s seen as the first real test of the national security issue. A decision is also likely as soon as early 2019 on a Chinese challenge to the EU’s refusal to grant Beijing market economy status at the WTO – something the U.S. has also refused to do.

Some experts see reasons to be encouraged, though.

It’s a good thing the U.S. and others are even pressing their cases at the WTO, said Bown of the Peterson Institute. That’s particularly true, he said, as many of the U.S.’s actions so far – including its metals tariffs and the ones Washington’s imposed on $250 billion in annual trade with China are arguably illegal, as has been the retaliation by Brussels and Beijing.

“The fact that it is actually happening is at some level a positive sign,” Bown said.

So, the fight over WTO authority seems likely to intensify and to threaten the operation and effectiveness of the WTO and the effectiveness of the overall global trading system. Such threats also increasingly threaten the access of U.S. products to growing global markets. This is a high stakes battle that concerns U.S. producers and which should be watched closely as it proceeds, Washington Insider believes.


Want to keep up with events in Washington and elsewhere throughout the day? See DTN Top Stories, our frequently updated summary of news developments of interest to producers. You can find DTN Top Stories in DTN Ag News, which is on the Main Menu on classic DTN products and on the News and Analysis Menu of DTN’s Professional and Producer products. DTN Top Stories is also on the home page and news home page of online.dtn.com. Subscribers of MyDTN.com should check out the US Ag Policy, US Farm Bill and DTN Ag News sections on their News Homepage.

If you have questions for DTN Washington Insider, please email edit@dtn.com

(BAS)