Washington Insider-- Wednesday

DTN's Washington Insider

Here’s a quick monitor of Washington farm and trade policy issues from DTN’s well-placed observer.

Refinery Part of RFS Exemption Case To Shift To Biodiesel

HollyFrontier announced they will convert their refinery in Cheyenne, Wyoming, to produce renewable biodiesel, one of the plants at the center of the 10th Circuit Court case in which the court ruled a small refinery exemptions (SRE) granted for the 2016 compliance year was invalid.

The company said it would spend between $125 million and $175 million to convert the facility to produce around 90 million gallons of renewable diesel per year. Completion is targeted for the first quarter of 2022. The company said it would halt petroleum refining at the site and would reduce its workforce.

“This decision was primarily based on the expectation that future free cash flow generation in Cheyenne would be challenged due to lower gross margins resulting from the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and compressed crude differentials resulting from dislocations in the crude oil market, coupled with forecasted uncompetitive operating and maintenance costs and the anticipated loss of the Environmental Protection Agency’s small refinery exemption,” the company stated.

This certainly indicates that the firm will not be pursuing a challenge to the court ruling, keeping attention on EPA and how they intend to address the ruling.

***

Additional Meetings on Tap Over EPA RFS Proposal

There are six meetings scheduled so far at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on EPA’s proposed levels for 2021 biofuel and 2022 biodiesel under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS).

The latest session scheduled is with is representatives from the Society of Independent Gasoline Marketers of America and National Associations of Convenience Stores.

Missing so far from the list are the Renewable Fuels Association (RFA) and several other groups that represent biofuel interests.

---

Washington Insider: Fight Over Next Economic Stimulus Proposals

POLITICO is reporting this week that Congress is struggling now over what to do next to support the economy. It observes this is demonstrating that “evidence isn’t everything in Washington.”

The report notes that “Congress is once again debating stimulus for a crushed economy as governors are once again confronted with gigantic budget shortfalls."

POLITICO thinks that memories of 2009 have faded, and the politics have been “scrambled” under the President Donald Trump's administration, but that “state aid” was used successfully in an earlier recession.

POLITICO points out that in January 2009 tax revenues were collapsing and state budgets were hemorrhaging. The new Obama administration was “terrified” that without a massive infusion of cash, governors would tip the recession into a full-blown depression by laying off employees and cutting needed services. A large infusion of direct aid to states was discussed.

However, the politics of that 2009 approach were “dismal” POLITICO says. Some leaders were already opposing any stimulusâ??and even Democrats who supported the new president's approach weren’t excited to help Republican governors balance their budgets.

The reason, POLITICO says, is that most “politicians enjoy spending money more than they enjoy giving it to other politicians to spend.” And since the direct state aid approach was “untried,” the proposal was seen as “more hunch-based than evidence-based.”

Ultimately, the Congress approved $140 billion in state aidâ??only two-thirds of the administration’s original request but far more than any previous stimulus.

Still, POLITICO sees evidence that the state bailouts worked. It points to “at least a dozen post-recession studies that found state fiscal aid gave a significant boost to the economy.” POLITICO adds that several studies concluded that “more state aid would have produced a stronger recovery.”

Now, a similar fight is underway. Democratic leaders have made state aid a top priority and $150 billion has already been provided for state, local and tribal governments in the CARES Act that Congress passed in March. The next battle is over the additional $915 billion in the HEROES Act that the House passed in May.

Republican leaders accepted the fiscal relief in the March bill but they kept it out of the last round of stimulus that Congress enacted in April. The also have declared the HEROES Act dead on arrival. Though they’re no longer denouncing stimulus as socialism, as they did in the past, they’ve begun attacking state aid as a “blue-state bailout.”

POLITICO says that most voters tell pollsters that they want Congress to help states avoid layoffs of teachers, police officers and public health workers. Still, key leaders like Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and other influential Republicans are trying to “reframe state aid as Big Government Democratic welfare spending.”

“There wasn’t a lot of evidence that state aid would be a good stimulus in 2009, but now there’s a lot of data, and it all adds up to juice for the economy,” Moody’s chief economist Mark Zandi says. “It’s baffling that this is getting caught up in politics. If states don’t get the support they need soon, they’ll eliminate millions of jobs and cut spending at the worst possible time.”

The coronavirus is ravaging state budgets even faster than the Great Recession did, drying up revenue from sales taxes and income taxes while ratcheting up demand for health and unemployment benefits. And, as Senator Mitt Romney, R-Utah, pointed out earlier this month, “Blue states aren’t the only ones who are getting screwed.” The Republican governors of Texas, Georgia and Ohio have also directed state agencies to prepare draconian spending cuts to close massive budget gaps, he noted.

POLITICO notes that “fiscal experts” say the assertions that irresponsible states brought these problems on themselves with unbalanced budgets and out-of-control spending has little basis in reality. Unlike the federal government, which was running a trillion-dollar deficit even before the pandemic, every state except Vermont is required by law to balance its budget every year. State finances were unusually healthy before the crisis hit; overall, they had reserved 7.6% of their budgets in rainy day funds, up from 5% before the Great Recession.

But now, governors of both parties are pivoting to austerity and more public employees are applying for unemployment benefits, meaning fewer state and local services in a time of need and fewer dollars circulating in the economy as it begins to reopen. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, who has approved a plan to buy up to $500 billion worth of state and local government bonds to help ease their money problems, recently suggested that direct federal aid to states also “deserves a careful look,” which in Fed-speak qualifies as a desperate plea for congressional action.

So, we will see. The state aid fight is intense, increasingly bitter and likely to be prolonged. It involves high stakes and clearly should be watched closely by producers as the election season progresses, Washington Insider believes.

---

Want to keep up with events in Washington and elsewhere throughout the day? See DTN Top Stories, our frequently updated summary of news developments of interest to producers. You can find DTN Top Stories in DTN Ag News, which is on the Main Menu on classic DTN products and on the News and Analysis Menu of DTN’s Professional and Producer products. DTN Top Stories is also on the home page and news home page of online.dtn.com. Subscribers of MyDTN.com should check out the US Ag Policy, US Farm Bill and DTN Ag News sections on their News Homepage.

If you have questions for DTN Washington Insider, please email edit@dtn.com

(c) Copyright 2020 DTN, LLC. All rights reserved.