Here’s a quick monitor of Washington farm and trade policy issues from DTN’s well-placed observer.China Mulls Next Moves After Latest Trade War Escalations
China Ministry of Commerce spokesman Gao Feng said Thursday (August 29) Beijing "firmly reject[s] an escalation of the trade war," adding that it remains "willing to negotiate and collaborate in order to solve this problem with calm attitude."
China will not immediately retaliate over the duties announced by President Donald Trump that are set to take effect this weekend, Gao stated. "China has ample means for retaliation but thinks the question that should be discussed now is about removing the new tariffs to prevent escalation of the trade war," he said.
Gao noted that the U.S. and China have maintained "effective communications" since the last set of face-to-face talks in Shanghai in July. He added that the two sides are "still discussing" whether Chinese negotiators will travel to Washington for more in person talks in September.
On the U.S. side, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said officials still anticipate additional talks, but would not confirm whether the previously planned September meeting is still on tap. "We continue to have conversations. We’re planning for them to come," he told Bloomberg in an interview.
USDA Again Cuts FY 2019 US Agricultural Export Outlook
U.S. agricultural exports are now forecast at $134.5 billion for Fiscal Year (FY) 2019, down $2.5 billion from May's forecast of $137 billion, according to USDA's August 2019 Outlook for U.S. Agricultural Exports.
If those export numbers hold they would be the lowest since FY 2016 when U.S. agricultural exports were valued at $129.6 billion. It would also mark first year since FY 2016 that exports have not reached at least $140 billion.
The value of U.S. agricultural imports held steady at a record $129 billion, the same as the May forecast. If the forecast comes to pass, it would mark three years in a row of record import values.
The decline in ag exports is forecast to put the U.S. agricultural trade surplus at just $5.3 billion, down $2.8 billion from May's forecast of $8 billion and around one third of the $15.8 billion surplus registered for FY 2018. If realized, it would be the smallest U.S. agricultural trade surplus since FY 2006 when it stood at $4.6 billion.***
Washington Insider: Economic Growth and Spending, Broken
There is a lot of angst around the country just now regarding the prospects for the medium-term economic outlook. In that context, the Washington Post is carrying an Op-Ed by Jared Bernstein, senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and former advisor to Vice President Joe Biden, who writes that the large and growing budget deficit for FY 2018 of $779 billion is a huge jump over the prior year’s level and a particularly large deficit considering the strong underlying economy.
Bernstein says that the Trump administration, with its tax cut, has broken a key fiscal function. In the past when employment was high tax revenues as a share of the economy were expected to rise significantly, deficits were expected to fall. Instead, revenues recently have gone way down, and deficits have climbed.
He argues that this is primarily because the recent tax cuts have significantly cut the amount of federal tax revenue being spun off for any given growth rate. Increased spending also played a role, he says, but “not as large a one as the tax cuts.” If this sounds out of sync with Republican claims that “tax cuts will pay for themselves,” that’s because it is. They don’t … never did … never will, he asserts.
Bernstein presents data back to the mid-1940s and calculated the average deficit as a share of GDP. In every year since the late 1940s when unemployment rate was at or below 4.5% (it’s currently 3.7%) the average deficit was 0.4%, as opposed to the 3.9% for 2018.
This shows, he says, a shift in the heretofore “tight correlation between deficit and unemployment rates.” For example, he notes that in both fiscal 2000 and 2018, the unemployment rate was 4%. In 2000, the strong economy teamed up with the structure of the tax code generated revenues to the Treasury of 20% of GDP. This year, that share fell to 16.5%.
Bernstein expects that advocates of the tax cuts will point to the difference in the spending between the two years, but uses projections by Congressional Budget Office to compare the two periods. The CBO projected in the summer of 2017, before the tax cuts and this year’s spending deal, that we’d spend 20.5% of GDP this year, almost exactly what happened (20.3%). But CBO also thought, ahead of the tax cut that we’d collect 17.7% of GDP in revenues when the actual was, as shown, 16.5%. This diminished revenue figure is the key difference between what CBO expected then and what occurred, he says.
He sees this difference as highly important. Based on our aging demographics alone, we will need more revenue over the next decade, not less. Add in geopolitical threats, climate change and the damage from increasingly intense storms, infrastructure, the need to push back on poverty and inequality, as well as counter-cyclical fiscal policy that will be needed for the next downturn and he concludes that “it’s not hard to understand why a rising deficit at full economic capacity is so ill-advised.”
These observations lead him to conclude that it is necessary to take steps to claw back the lost revenue, as well as to look for reasonable savings on the spending side.
He thinks this will be hard, given claims from administration officials who believe that expected strong economic growth, combined with proposals to cut wasteful spending, will lead America toward a sustainable financial path. He calls that “magical thinking” and also argues that the red ink we learned about this week is merely the beginning of a tide that will only, absent corrective action, get larger.
Here it seems we have the basis for an intense debate, both between the parties and within them. The administration wants a bustling economy and it seems completely unwilling to be deterred by implications of growing deficits and debt.
At the same time, many of the Democratic contenders are proposing large, strong government programs to do many things and have been willing to argue that “modern economics” leads to less prominent concerns about debt levels and deficits—although their spending priorities are very different than most of those proposed by the administration.
That raises the question of who will focus on the debt, and whether that concern will—or won’t—constrain ambitions for government programs, given the many, many concerns regarding urgent public needs. It still seems that debt worries have not disappeared entirely, and that possibly Bernstein’s former link to a top democratic contender may mean new policy efforts from that direction.
So, we will see. The Post carried the Bernstein note but did not weigh in on the intensity and potential political impact of the debt issue—or of its absence. Nevertheless, this is a fight that can be expected to emerge at some point and which should be watched closely by producers and others as it does, Washington Insider believes.
Want to keep up with events in Washington and elsewhere throughout the day? See DTN Top Stories, our frequently updated summary of news developments of interest to producers. You can find DTN Top Stories in DTN Ag News, which is on the Main Menu on classic DTN products and on the News and Analysis Menu of DTN’s Professional and Producer products. DTN Top Stories is also on the home page and news home page of online.dtn.com. Subscribers of MyDTN.com should check out the US Ag Policy, US Farm Bill and DTN Ag News sections on their News Homepage.
If you have questions for DTN Washington Insider, please email firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright 2019 DTN/The Progressive Farmer. All rights reserved.