Here's a quick monitor of Washington farm and trade policy issues from DTN's well-placed observer.EPA Sends RFS Plans To White House
EPA has sent its final proposal for 2019 biofuel and 2020 biodiesel levels under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review.
EPA earlier this year proposed setting the RFS mandate at 19.88 billion gallons for 2019, an increase from 2018 levels and about as expected by the industry. The proposed level for conventional ethanol -- primarily corn-based ethanol -- was 15 billion gallons.
It is not clear whether EPA has adjusted the final levels compared to those it proposed earlier this year.
The agency has pledged to complete the process for the standards by November 30 as called for by law.
Report: Mexico, Canada Steel and Aluminum Retaliation Will More Than Offset USMCA
While improved market access via the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) will lead to gains in U.S. agriculture exports, those gains will be more than offset by the retaliatory actions taken by Mexico and Canada relative to U.S. steel and aluminum import duties, according to a study released by the Farm Foundation.
The boost in U.S. ag exports is pegged at $450 million, primarily for dairy and poultry, said the report conducted by Purdue University. The retaliatory actions by Mexico and Canada "will cause U.S. agricultural exports to decline by $1.8 billion," the report said.
Combined with retaliatory tariffs by China and others that hit US ag goods, the report said the U.S. "would see a decline in agricultural exports of $7.9 billion, thus overwhelming the small positive gains from USMCA."
Washington Insider: Currency Values and the US-China Trade War
Urban media is preoccupied with the pre-election posturing it sees just now -- especially the threats being swapped by the United States and China over increasingly punishing tariffs. The New York Times says also that the "world is watching to see whether Beijing turns to one of its most potent economic weapons -- its currency."
China's currency, the renminbi, has gradually lost value since mid-April. This week it was at "its weakest point in a decade," the Times reports. If the currency weakens any further, it could fall below the "psychologically important" level of 7 renminbi to the dollar. The last time it took more than 7 renminbi to buy a dollar was in May 2008, as the world was slipping into a financial crisis.
In the arsenal of trade disputes, currencies may be potent weapons, but they are blunt ones and can boomerang against those who use them.
There is nothing particularly threatening about the number 7 itself, the Times says. The renminbi at 7.002 to the dollar is pretty similar to the currency at 6.998 to the dollar.
Still, falling below the "7" threshold "would be significant symbolically." It would suggest China is prepared to let its currency weaken further still. That would give China's factory owners an advantage when they sell their goods in the United States. It would also undermine the tariffs the Trump administration has levied on more than $250 billion in Chinese-made products.
The United States imposes tariffs of about 10% on a wide variety of Chinese goods that arrive at an American port. If the renminbi falls 10%, the tariff is essentially nullified.
Some politicians in the United States and elsewhere have long argued that China manipulates its currency, even though Washington officials -- including in the Trump administration -- have stopped short of official accusations. In this case, many of the forces weakening the currency are beyond Beijing's immediate control.
China's financial system is firmly controlled by the government, giving the country's leaders a great degree of control over how much the renminbi is worth. Officials set a daily benchmark rate for the renminbi and allow its value to move a smidgen above or below that level in currency markets. Chinese officials say each day's trading activity helps determine the value they set for the renminbi the next day, but they disclose few details about how that actually works.
On Tuesday, Beijing set that guidepost at 6.9574, "just a hair's breadth stronger than 7." In the world of foreign exchange, a higher number means a weaker currency.
Chinese traders are sending the message that renminbi should be worth less. The people and companies that hold the currency have become increasingly nervous about China's slowing economic growth, slumping stock market, fragile real estate market and seemingly intractable trade war with the United States. Inflation has begun to tick upward, and rising prices tend to make holding the relevant currency less attractive.
There are other reasons. Since late July, Beijing has tried to prop up the economy by having the state-controlled banking sector increase lending, making money more available. That means even more renminbi in circulation, weakening the currency's value.
While China hasn't raised interest rates, the Federal Reserve in Washington has. That makes it attractive for many people to sell their renminbi and buy dollars.
Still, the Times thinks that Beijing is trying to keep the renminbi from falling too fast.
China has a number of ways to bolster the currency's value. One option is to follow the U.S. Fed's example and raise interest rates, which would increase Chinese incentives to keep their money in China -- but also would raise the cost of borrowing in China, just as the economy is slowing.
Or, Beijing could buy up its own currency instead.
Thanks to the way it has managed its currency over the years, China has amassed the world's largest foreign exchange reserves -- a $3 trillion stash of money it keeps in dollars, euros, pounds, yen and other currencies. It now has begun to tap that stash. The most recent report by China's central bank showed a drop of almost $20 billion in foreign currency just during September.
"Selling almost $20 billion in a month won't break the bank," said Brad W. Setser, an economist at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York. "But it does indicate the direction of current market pressure." And, the Times says, that indicates "broader risks."
Three years ago, as its economy slowed, China devalued the renminbi in part to give its factories a helping hand. The financial world was shocked. Markets plunged.
A year later, China had spent more than $500 billion from its reserves in an effort to shore up the renminbi. It later tightened controls on the financial system to shut off many ways people used to get money out of the country.
So, the Times notes that the international financial system is highly complex and difficult to assess. However, the key message is that should the trade war intensify, China may look to make more aggressive moves with its currency. History shows there can be a price to pay. Certainly, this is a development U.S. producers should watch closely as it evolves, Washington Insider believes.
Want to keep up with events in Washington and elsewhere throughout the day? See DTN Top Stories, our frequently updated summary of news developments of interest to producers. You can find DTN Top Stories in DTN Ag News, which is on the Main Menu on classic DTN products and on the News and Analysis Menu of DTN's Professional and Producer products. DTN Top Stories is also on the home page and news home page of online.dtn.com. Subscribers of MyDTN.com should check out the US Ag Policy, US Farm Bill and DTN Ag News sections on their News Homepage.
If you have questions for DTN Washington Insider, please email firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright 2018 DTN/The Progressive Farmer. All rights reserved.