Here’s a quick monitor of Washington farm and trade policy issues from DTN’s well-placed observer.USDA's Perdue Reiterates No 2019 Farmer Aid in the Works
USDA is looking at the potential levels for payments under a second installment of farmer aid payments and there is not likely to be a change in the amounts announced for the first installment currently being paid to producers, according to USDA Secretary Sonny Perdue.
"We are continuing to looking at market conditions. We are discussing this really as we speak. Frankly right now, we see no change in the amount," USDA Secretary Sonny Perdue told reporters after an event in Washington, even though he previously had indicated a second installment could be smaller than the first.
As for timing of that second installment, Perdue said he was hopeful of getting the payment announced "around October, November. It looks like it may be December. But I wouldn't expect the second tranche any later than December."
But Perdue also said that another round of farmer payments for 2019 production is not planned. "Farmers are very resilient and adept at making their planning and marketing decisions based on the current market," he remarked. "These facts are known now, unlike they were in 2018. So farmers, even under financial duress, will make their best business decisions for 2019 without the expectation of a market facilitation program."
API Still Talking Legal Action on Year-Round E15
The oil industry on Monday threatened to the sue the Trump administration if it carries out the president’s announced plan to relax rules to allow E15 ethanol blends to be sold year-round.
“We think it is against the law,” Frank Macchiarola, American Petroleum Institute (API) vice president of downstream and industry operations told reporters on a call. "We are going to consider all of our legal options” to ensure “this policy is not enacted.”
Macchiarola made the remarks in a session where API released results of a poll indicating consumers were concerned about the potential year-round E15 sales.
"The waiver is explicitly disallowed under the Clean Air Act, and even the EPA has agreed in the past that the agency does not have the authority to waive the vapor pressure requirements that would allow year-round sales of E15," Macchiarola said.
Washington Insider: Wider Trade Deficit Anticipated
The administration’s trade policy is more than ever a very hot topic as the fall elections near. This week, The Hill is running a note by a prominent trade expert, Desmond Lachman – a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute – who says the current widening deficits should have been anticipated.
Lachman’s experience includes services as a former Deputy Director in the International Monetary Fund's Policy Development and Review Department and as Chief Emerging Market Economic Strategist at Salomon Smith Barney.
He says that “not only has the U.S. trade deficit steadily widened... but, it has now reached an all-time high, running at an annual rate of close to a staggering $1 trillion.”
Furthermore, Lachman says, given these policies, “There is every prospect that the trade deficit will continue to widen during the remainder of his first term in office.”
He also argues that while the widening U.S. trade deficit might have come as a surprise to President Trump and his economic team, “it should have come as no surprise to anyone who had bothered to take an introductory course in international economics.”
Such a course, he says, would have taught that the main determinant of trade deficits is not so much the level of a country’s import tariffs but is a question of “whether the country saves enough to finance its investment.”
If a country reduces its savings and increases its investment level, its trade deficit will necessarily widen. That has proved once again to have been the case for the U.S. over the past two years. Such courses also teach that the level of the dollar is an important determinant of both exports and imports. A strengthening dollar makes it more difficult to export and cheaper to import, he says.
Looking ahead, he “finds every reason to expect that over the next two years, the U.S. trade deficit will rise to well over $1 trillion a year.”
“Among the main reasons for expecting this to happen is the Trump administration’s budget policy, which holds out the prospect of a major decline in the country’s savings level," he says.
That policy includes an unfunded tax cut which is estimated by the Congressional Budget Office to increase the U.S. public debt by a mind-boggling $1.5 trillion over the next 10 years. It also
includes support of a Congress-approved $300 billion increase in public spending over the next two years.
As a result of the administration’s expansive budget policy at this late stage in the economic cycle, it is widely expected that over the next two years, the U.S. budget deficit will rise to a peace-time high of over $1 trillion.
He also thinks that it is “all too likely” that we will be revisiting the famous twin-deficit problem of the Reagan presidency when we had both an outsized budget deficit and an outsized trade deficit.
Yet another reason to fear that the U.S. trade deficit will widen in the year ahead is that a strengthening dollar will discourage exports and incentivize imports. Already, over the past year, the U.S. dollar has appreciated by around 10%. “That strengthening is all too likely to continue in the period ahead as U.S. monetary policy becomes increasingly out of synch with that of our major trade partners," Lachman says.
Indeed, at a time that an expansive budget policy is forcing the Federal Reserve to keep raising interest rates to prevent economic overheating, the European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan are keeping their foot on the pedal to provide support to their lackluster economies. In the process, they are increasing the relative attractiveness of U.S. financial assets.
Another factor likely to contribute to a further strengthening of the U.S. dollar is the current global financial market turmoil that is being caused in part by the uncertainty engendered by President Trump’s "America First" trade policy.
“As has happened so often in the past in times of global turmoil, too much capital is likely to be repatriated to the United States in search of a safe haven for investment,” Lachman thinks. As a matter of arithmetic, under a floating exchange rate regime, as the U.S. capital account surplus strengthens, its external current account and trade account deficits must be expected to widen.
Lachman is super-critical of the administration’s economic team. They are all well trained, he says, and should have learned that an unfunded tax cut coupled with public spending increases runs the all-too-real risk of having the country revisit the twin deficit problem of the 1980s.
So, we will see. These are not new arguments and the administration seems unlikely to shift main players for economic reasons, but might for political reasons. Now, the President and his team are deeply dug in and believe the results they see are generally positive. Only if that changes or is confronted strongly by the Congress is it likely to shift — a fight producers should watch closely as it proceeds, Washington Insider believes.
Want to keep up with events in Washington and elsewhere throughout the day? See DTN Top Stories, our frequently updated summary of news developments of interest to producers. You can find DTN Top Stories in DTN Ag News, which is on the Main Menu on classic DTN products and on the News and Analysis Menu of DTN’s Professional and Producer products. DTN Top Stories is also on the home page and news home page of online.dtn.com. Subscribers of MyDTN.com should check out the US Ag Policy, US Farm Bill and DTN Ag News sections on their News Homepage.
If you have questions for DTN Washington Insider, please email email@example.com
Copyright 2018 DTN/The Progressive Farmer. All rights reserved.